Essay topics:
The pie chart below describe about the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years
The pie chart below describe about the comparison of different kinds of energy production by France in 1995 and 2005. Generally, as illustrated in the pie chart that the highest production was the other types of energy and the lowest was Petro.
From 1995 to 2005, the data shown that both of the type of energy production such as other and nuclear increased for about 5% in one decade. While the production of Petro which was in the third position of the highest production in 1995 has become the lowest type of energy was produced by France. For types of energy like Gas and Coal grew minimally, only for about 1% in 10 years.
Votes
This essay topic by users
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-12 | Lee Daisy | view | |
| 2023-07-19 | CHÚC | view | |
| 2023-07-02 | Risti | view | |
| 2023-06-23 | ryan.pambudi | view | |
| 2023-06-23 | ryan.pambudi | view |
Essay Categories
Essays by user Arman Mansyur
:
- The pie charts below describe about the average of household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 56
- The charts below show one government's spending on culture and education in 1995 and 2005 and the number of people participating in arts events in the same years. 67
- The number of people who are at risk of serious health problems due to being overweight is increasing. what is the reason for the growth in overweight people in society? How can this problem be solved? 84
- The pie chart below describe about the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 56
- The charts below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The pie chart below describe about the comparison of ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r increased for about 5% in one decade. While the production of Petro which was in th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, third, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 520.0 965.302439024 54% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 114.0 196.424390244 58% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.56140350877 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.26757987692 3.73543355544 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35545508709 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 60.0 106.607317073 56% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 158.4 283.868780488 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.2123935207 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.0 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.8 5.23603664747 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367048845409 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.239632067598 0.103423049105 232% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.249850151528 0.0843802449381 296% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.351374817249 0.15604864568 225% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.204643078689 0.0819641961636 250% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 18.0 40.7170731707 44% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.