The charts below shows the spending of school in UK from 1981 to 2001.
The pie charts gives information about the United Kingdom school expenditure in 2 decades between 1981 and 2001.
Overall, it can be seen from the charts that most of the money was spent on teacher salaries over the period given whereas, insurance was the least. Other workers have showed a decrease in the number of percentage. The other two pursuits (furniture and equipment and resources e.g books) have experienced a fluctuation.
In 1981, the school have spent a large proportion of money (40%) on the teacher salaries but in the next following decade (1991) the figure accelerated to 50% while, in 2001 it dropped to 45%. The percentage of other worker salaries was 28% in 1981, then in 1991 the percentage fall to 22%. At the end of the period it was almost half of the 1981 which was 15%.
Insurance was almost remained under 10% in all three decades. Same amount (15%) was consumed on both furniture and equipment and resources like books in the first decade. In the next ten years the saving paid on furniture and equipment were 5% and resources e.g book were 20%. In the last decade the amount of paid on furniture and equipment was 23% and resources e.g book were under 10%.
- Some parents are worried about the increasing level of violence in TV video games and other types of entertainment for children s leisure How does this affect children How do you think this problem can be tackled 77
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 73
- Some people think that happiness relies on the individuals Others argue that it is affected by other factors Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The diagram below show the water supply system in Australia at present and in future 67
- The table gives information about the underground railway system in 6 countries 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66507177033 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4581569633 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521531100478 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2251318998 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.6363636364 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.27272727273 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141292867347 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547155288313 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0684917388711 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110235713018 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825266639479 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.0 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.