The bar chart provides information regarding the export earnings of some commodities in a country in two different years (2015 and 2016), with the figures of changing value’s percentages being shown in a table.
As regards the first, the revenue of the country increased in the year 2016 in contrast with 2015 in four commodities except for gems and jewelry that dropped (5.18%). Furthermore, the highest rate of increment was for the textiles that rocketed 15.24%, followed by engineered goods in 8.5%. It is worth noting that the vast majority of earning was for petroleum products (about 62 and 65 billion) and for engineered goods (approximately 57 and 63 billion) in the year 2015 and 2016 respectively. Finally, agricultural products with textiles profits were comparable in the year 2016, and had the lowest profit for the country, but the minimum export earnings was for textiles (26 billion) in the year 2015.
To sum up, by comparing the marks of table and the bar charts pattern, it is obvious that majority of products increased the country’s income in the year 2016, and the the enormous rate profits were for petroleum products and engineered foods.
- In spite of advances made in agriculture many people Around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 11
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organization Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 84
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together Do you agree or disagree 78
- In future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 88
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... country’s income in the year 2016, and the the enormous rate profits were for petroleu...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... country’s income in the year 2016, and the the enormous rate profits were for petroleu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, regarding, so, as for, as regards, except for, in contrast, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0414507772 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73338530128 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518134715026 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.5385809576 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.166666667 112.824112599 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1666666667 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 17.8333333333 5.23603664747 341% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213535244911 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120791177911 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879803636442 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176112555652 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0810004385553 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.2329268293 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
... country’s income in the year 2016, and the the enormous rate profits were for petroleu...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
... country’s income in the year 2016, and the the enormous rate profits were for petroleu...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, furthermore, if, regarding, so, as for, as regards, except for, in contrast, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0414507772 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73338530128 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518134715026 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.5385809576 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.166666667 112.824112599 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1666666667 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 17.8333333333 5.23603664747 341% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213535244911 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120791177911 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879803636442 0.0843802449381 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176112555652 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0810004385553 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.2329268293 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.