The charts below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main

The chart illustrates the exports revenues in a number of categories of a country during the courses of two years, 2015 and 2016. The proportion of differences in each type of exports between the said years are stated in the table below.

At the first glance, 2016 has been a more superior time compare to 2015 in terms of exporting. All, except the Gem and Jewellery industry, were recorded to have been expanding their numbers in sales outside of the country. Meanwhile, there was a unfortunate decrease of 5.18% in foreign income for luxurious goods.

Petroleum products and Engineered goods were both running for the highest oversea earning category in 2016, with Petroleum scoring a little bit higher in sales and landed in the top with over $60 billions in total revenue. However, in terms of growth Engineered goods absoblutely did a more impressive job, with 8.5% against Petroleum products’ 3%.

Agricultural yields reported to a practically zero percent of growth between 2015 and 2016. Its sale figure was also amongst the lowest of the five categories. In contradiction to the low digits in money earned, Textiles surprisingly had grown at twice the speed of Engineering products which was 15.24% the highest of all surveyed.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...de of the country. Meanwhile, there was a unfortunate decrease of 5.18% in foreig...
^
Line 5, column 134, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...egory in 2016, with Petroleum scoring a little bit higher in sales and landed in the top w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ely did a more impressive job, with 8.5% against Petroleum products’ 3%. Agri...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, well, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09268292683 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76465324318 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.634146341463 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 307.8 283.868780488 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6220600159 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.4 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233620823185 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0886272380654 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103159605896 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143736532912 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.120014930519 0.0819641961636 146% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.