The charts compare the amount of electricity produced by all types of sources in New Zealand and Germany
The charts compare the amount of electricity produced by all types of sources in New Zealand and Germany between 1980 and 2010. Overall, there was an upward trend in the total electricity production in both countries. Additionally, electricity production units from coal in New Zealand registered the highest figure in 2010, while the amount of electricity produced from nuclear power recorded the highest data in the same year.
In 1980, NZ harnessed more than half coal for electricity, which doubled the figure for Germany, at 28 units. A similar pattern was exhibited in the data for petroleum in NZ and G, at 22 units and 11 units respectively. Nz derived about 30% of its electricity from Hydro and Natural gas, while in Germany, the number of electricity units produced from natural gas was 4 times as much as the figure for Hydro, at 28 units and 7 units respectively. Electricity production from nuclear constituted 20 units in the supply in Germany.
In 2010, most electricity generated in NZ come from coal, at 150 units. Meanwhile, the energy came from nuclear contributed to 155 units for the electricity production in G. In contrast, natural gas was minimally harnessed for electricity generation in both countries, at 2 units. The amount of electricity production from hydro took up 46 units, which was 44 units higher than that of its counterpart. In particular, the number of electricity generation ranged from a lower of 2 units in 1980 to a high of 27 units in 2010.
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.https://www.ielts-mentor.com/writing-sam 11
- people communication 67
- Bài 3: Car maker’s total sales 73
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different nations in 2002 84
- face-to-face contact 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, so, while, in contrast, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1239.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93625498008 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95791982545 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462151394422 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 385.2 283.868780488 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.5582655021 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9166666667 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239296995777 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120697179127 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.212521488151 0.0843802449381 252% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216927695089 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.208047944194 0.0819641961636 254% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.