the charts give information about employment in the UK in 1998 and 2012.
summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts shows about the comparison between the percentage and a number of profession in UK between 1998 and 2012. Overall, it can be see as a proportion there are some occupation which decreased such as men (full-time) and women (part-time) while the others increase, on the other hand the number of employment is going up.
In 1998, there was around 12,539 for Men who worked as full-time and got about 53% for the percentage. And then in the second place was working women as part-time approximately 5,268 and got 22% for the proportion, afterwards was women whose work was full-time got proportion all over 19% and it get the sum about 4,482. Next was about 6% for men whose worked in part-time and had around 1,550 for the total in number.
While in 2012, there was a decreased for the percentage of men who worked in full-time became 47% while the number of the workers had increase to 13,794. Then, there was an increase for the women who worked in full-time ahead of 7,696 and got about 26% for the total of the percentage, this is followed by women whose worked as part-time which is increase to 5,979 and got 20% of the percentage. Finally, in 2012 men who worked in part-time rose to 7% and total for the workers about 2,131.
- some people think that they can make as much noise as they want while others think that the amount of noise people make should be strictly controlled discuss both views and include your opinion and examples 56
- the charts give information about employment in the UK in 1998 and 2012 summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 12, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'show'.
Suggestion: show
The charts shows about the comparison between the percen...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 296, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'gets'?
Suggestion: gets
...time got proportion all over 19% and it get the sum about 4,482. Next was about 6% ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, second, so, then, while, such as, in the second place, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55605381166 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49084470528 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448430493274 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.0478311356 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.0 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.875 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.125 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0756634854392 0.215688989381 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566944303736 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0646764825962 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0713817826337 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451133179489 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.75 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.