The charts show the distribution of money spent on music in three different
years in Northern Ireland
The pie charts demonstrate the amount of spendings on listening to music in three seperate years in Northen Ireland.
Overall, it is obvious that Irish people in the north depended more on CDs, attending concerts and digital music rather than any other source to listen to music.
In 2005, it can be seen that the majority of the money was spent on CDs, standing at well over half. As for concerts, 31% of people enjoyed going there for music, while a very minor proportion downloaded music and used other sources, with figures of 6% and 2% respectively.
In the following three years, there was an evident decrease in the percentage of CDs reaching 41% in total. On the other hand, more and more people listened to digital music as it stood at 25%.
In 2011, downloaded music increased significantly replacing both CDs and concerts, as it accounted for almost half the sales. The percentage for CDs and concerts were nearly equal with only a 2% difference, and the "other" category remained the least used at 3%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-13 | celine ayoub | 78 | view |
| 2020-11-24 | dbvsky | view | |
| 2020-11-24 | dbvsky | 70 | view |
| 2020-11-24 | dbvsky | 30 | view |
| 2019-07-12 | davinderkaur | 89 | view |
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 78
- The line graph shows the average temperature during the hottest part of the day Australia in 2007 84
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children s charity located in the USA spent and received in one year
- The maps below show the changes that occurred to a town named Willington in 1780 1860 and 2000 73
- Some people believe that teenagers should be required to do unpaid community work in their free time This can benefit teenagers and the community as well To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, well, while, as for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84090909091 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71426823769 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602272727273 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 254.7 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.6312766044 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.5 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 5.23603664747 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175026379552 0.215688989381 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800360436419 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797282809955 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110800670145 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891619127761 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.