The two graphs display information on how many kids in the UK learned to play an instrument between 1996 and 2016.
Overall, it can be argued that a greater proportion of youths are taking up musical instruments. Additionally, we can observe that pianos have a little increase tendency while keyboards have a slight negative trend in terms of the most popular selections from 1996 and 2016.
A deeper examination of the pie chart supplied reveals that over a 20-year period, the percentage of young people playing musical instruments climbed noticeably, rising from 44% to 76%.
The keyboard came in second place with over 20% on the 1996 bar chart, with the piano coming in first with 30%. Furthermore, more than 10% of youngsters study the violin and electric guitar, 13% and 14% learn both, and 12% learn both. The number of keyboard learners climbed dramatically in 2016, hitting a high of 30%. Pianos remain popular, although their usage is declining, with just around 28% of households owning one. The proportion of multi-instrumentalists is progressively growing to around 13%.
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present 78
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant. 11
- The table and chart below show the domestic water use and cost in 5 countries 67
- Healthcare should not be provided for free regardless of a person s income The health of a person is in their own hands and they should therefore be held accountable for that Do you agree with this opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12359550562 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99709491964 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.691011235955 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.4613334893 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.333333333 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237817759631 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810325506262 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086921391055 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147927311999 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0933533351922 0.0819641961636 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.