The charts show the proportion of holidaymakers of one region staying in different types of accommodation in three different years

The given circular chart depicts the information about the percentage of holidays makes using various accommodation between 1988 and 2008. The data has been calibrated in percentage.

Looking at the overall, it is clear that the stay with family and friends analyse data highest, in contrary side the merely rented quarters by far the lowest figure.

To commence with, the ratio of free days spent in rented quarters and hotels was 7% and 15%, respectively in 1988. During the same year, the ratio of holidays using in camping was 59%, meanwhile staying with family and friends had double of it, which collected at 52%. However, 77% people spending holidays in comping and staying with family and friends comprising of 13% and remaining in staying with family and friends.

Furthermore, The proportion of free days makers using in the rented house was 11%, whereas hotels have exactly more than trapped. In addition, the ratio of free days spent in rented accommodation and hotels was analogous which was 22%. The percentage of holidays using in comping was 12%, whereas staying with family and friends has 32% more.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: COMPRISING_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprising' or 'consisting of'?
Suggestion: comprising; consisting of
...ing and staying with family and friends comprising of 13% and remaining in staying with famil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... exactly more than trapped. In addition, the ratio of free days spent in rented a...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, look, whereas, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08648648649 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50179774661 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52972972973 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6809087554 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.555555556 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0811974568215 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363100654731 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0236349459343 0.0843802449381 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0515308847695 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129437471782 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 355, Rule ID: COMPRISING_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprising' or 'consisting of'?
Suggestion: comprising; consisting of
...ing and staying with family and friends comprising of 13% and remaining in staying with famil...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... exactly more than trapped. In addition, the ratio of free days spent in rented a...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, look, whereas, while, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08648648649 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50179774661 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52972972973 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 267.3 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6809087554 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.555555556 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5555555556 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0811974568215 0.215688989381 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363100654731 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0236349459343 0.0843802449381 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0515308847695 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0129437471782 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.