The charts compare standard weight of redident in Charlestown in the year 1995 and 2015.
Overall, people in 1995 had an appropriate propotion of ideal weight in most age group and many people were underweight while older people tend to have worse health in terms of weight in 2015.
Most of young people in Charlestown between 20 – 29 years old were ideal group in 2015 and 2019, but there was some people who had underweight. At 30 – 39, 40 – 49 and 50 - 59 year-old-age group, there was a mix body weight which under weight were about 25% in 1955. Interestingly, in 2015, average weight of people increased significantly, the number of overweight and obese were about 50%. Furthermore, 60 – 69 group had a big proportion of underweight group in 1995, which increasing from younger almost 2 times. On the other hand, majority of old people, 85%, were
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The gap between the rich and the poor is becoming richer and the poor are growing poorer. What are the causes of this? what measures can be taken to reduce this problem? 78
- UK Telephone Call, by category, 1995-2002 73
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 11
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 715.0 965.302439024 74% => OK
No of words: 151.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73509933775 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.50545371207 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72720183478 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622516556291 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 188.1 283.868780488 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.5558320122 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.142857143 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273744345868 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13559616114 0.103423049105 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0988050783634 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225820823355 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046590248649 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.