The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.
The bar chart illustrates that weight assessment of people lived in Charlestown in 1915 and 2015.
It is clear that, ideal health among the people was most popular in all aged people expect 60-69 in 2015 while, obesity was increased by passing the age year in 2015.
As the graph shows, according to 20-29 age group, the figure for ideal weight stood at 70% which was almost similar in 2015. By contrast, only 27% people suffered from under weight and following 60 years, it decreased by 7% in 2015 overweight among the people was higher in 2015 at 8% than 2% in 1955. The trend was almost same for age group 30-39 but the figure was different for ideal weight at 60%, then underweight had 20% in 1955 which experienced a declined to 2% in 2015 while the figure for overweight people was nearly doubled at 35% in 2015 then 19% in 1955. Both age group had no obesity in 1955 but it was noted at 2% in 20-29 and 10%in 30-39 in 2015.
By contrast, Regarding the age group 40-49, 50-59, and 60-69, the trend for obesity among the people rose significantly from 2% to 22%, 10% to 51% and 5% to 59% respectively. While, in terms of ideal weight proportion stood between 48% to 60%, for 40-69 aged people, but the pattern for 40-and 50-59 decreased slightly and figure for 60-69 plummeted to 3% in 2015. Only 20% for 40-49, 11% for 50-59 and 5% for 60-69 had overweight problem in 1955 compared to 34% for 40-49, 7% for 50-59 and 25%for 60-69 in 2015. Meantime, people who suffered from underweight in 1955, the number plunged in 2015 for above three groups.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | Kien Vu | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | cindycornelia98 | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-18 | skan | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-08 | kallgou | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | fachryadul92 | 61 | view |
- The two pie charts below show some employment patterns in Great Britain in 1992. 11
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time. Do advantages of this outweigh disadvantages? 67
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year, 2016. 89
- The world natural resources are consumed at an ever-increased rate. What are the dangers of this situation? What should we do? 56
- The world natural resources are consumed at an ever-increased rate. What are the dangers of this situation? What should we do? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 33.7804878049 151% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 284.0 196.424390244 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49647887324 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30156478428 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.457746478873 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.8987975807 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.7 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242110167608 0.215688989381 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147144512895 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122800313652 0.0843802449381 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223325728478 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146207747862 0.0819641961636 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 85.36 61.2550243902 139% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.