These two charts represent the weight measurement of residents of Charlestown and they compare the changes between 1955 and 2015.
From the second table, we can observe that most people having lived in Charlestown were healthy in terms of their weight; about 60% of all inhabitants belonged to the “ideal weight” category. However, we should note that not small number of people suffered from underweight in 1955. From the figure, we can see that the underweight people accounted for about 30% of the total population, and the probability of underweight was over 40% among people aged 60 to 69.
However, the trend in weight assessment had drastically changed over 60 years. Firstly, people in Charlestown had become unhealthier; the proportion of people belonged to the ideal weight category had diminished in all age groups. In addition, while almost all the problems regarding weight were underweight in 1955, obesity was the most serious issue in 2015; Although the probability of obesity was quite small in a younger population, about 60% of elderly people (aged 60 to 69) suffered from the obesity. This trend is highly opposed to the situation in 1955.
- The chart below shows the number of travellers using three major airports in New York City between 1995 and 2000. 67
- Modern communications mean that it’s no longer necessary to write letters.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
- The media is increasing interest in famous people who have ordinary backgrounds. Why do you think people are interested in the lives of famous people? Do you think this is a good thing? 73
- Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements, and this sets a bad example to young people.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- Is freedom of speech necessary in a free society? Give reasons for your answer. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, regarding, second, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 190.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18947368421 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81204374569 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547368421053 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.3259650499 43.030603864 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.25 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.75 5.23603664747 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181484809205 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889052786847 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545548906511 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150288424581 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461602879645 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.