The charts summarise the weight measurements of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart illustrates the comparison between weight measurement of people living in Charlestown in 1955 and 2015. Overall, in 1955 the percentage of ideal weight of Charlestown citizens from 20-29 to 60-69 year age ranges gravitate to stable, up to 50% respectively. In contrast, during 2015 the percentage of ideal weight of its citizens tend to decrease from 70% in 20-29 year age range to less than 10% in 60-69 year age range.
On the other hand, while in 1955 the number of obese people is the lowest and it just occurred from 40-49 to 60-69 year age ranges, in 2015 the number of obese people tend to escalate significantly, from less than 10% in 20-29 year age ranges to more or less 60% in 60-69 year age range.
Furthermore, during 1955 to 2015 the number of underweight in every classification of year age range gravitate to decline steeply. However, the number of overweight both of 1955 and 2015 tend to fluctuate unexpectedly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | Kien Vu | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-11 | cindycornelia98 | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-18 | skan | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | fachryadul92 | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-13 | fachryadul92 | 67 | view |
- The graph gives information about Dubai Gold Sales in 2002Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The line graph below shows the changes in the share price of Outokumpu companies in euros between January 2006 and December 2010 71
- The graph below shows the amount of money spent on books in Germany, France, Italy and Austria between 1995 to 2005. 67
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison 11
- The line graph shows the percentage of Internet users in three countries from 1999 to 2009. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, while, in contrast, more or less, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 785.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81595092025 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77608548281 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 72.0 106.607317073 68% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.441717791411 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.9131354957 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.833333333 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5 5.23603664747 258% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15034091139 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126303981871 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.139709377155 0.0843802449381 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111451073441 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565232261416 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.