The charts summarize the weight measurements of people living in Charleston in 1955 and 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart below illustrates the figures of people who lives in Charleston in 1955 and 2015 by age. Generally, both period experienced considerable modification in each period shown.
It is certain that ideal weighed person account for the largest proportion by the age from 20 to 29 in each period of 2015 and 1995. In 2015, the figures for 30-39 aged people, however, was significant for amount, at about 30 percent, leading them the major consequence for all period of the time, compare with obese people just about 10 percent.
In 1995, obese people was significantly lower rather than latter period people, between ages 40-49. In additional, there was importantly higher proportion for obese people in 2015 for both ages 50-59 and 60-69 respectively. However, last 2 ages of obese people was just reach 10 percent correspondingly.
It have revealed that the numbers of underweight person were relatively poorer for every age in all period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-23 | Enkhamgalan | 78 | view |
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people, while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate.Discuss both views and give you own opinion 56
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction.Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Immigration has the major impact on societyWhat are the main reasons of immigration?To what consequences it can lead? 11
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...tter period people, between ages 40-49. In additional, there was importantly highe...
^^
Line 4, column 4, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...t reach 10 percent correspondingly. It have revealed that the numbers of underweigh...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10897435897 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81078596686 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.9919913858 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.625 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0938255581305 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552468899367 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0765563192911 0.0843802449381 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0679921291796 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624783750467 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.