Nowadays, the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.
In what ways technology affected the type of relationship people make?
Has this become positive or negative developments?
In this modern world, there have been a thought that as human population increases, mankind are experiencing unprecedented technological advancement. And, it would be a both negative and positive effects like other things. In this essay, I will reveal that what factors have been contributes numb communication and explain both sides, and there will be a logical conclusion, including solution.
On the one hand, it is clear that such technology as computer, smart phones and others are posing gradually devastating problems on we human announcement. By considering computer, we will notice one major thing that people, particularly children are using computer in order to play online games, advertising rapes and murder, in much manner. By this way, mankind not be able to communicate and even exchange some fundamental daily information. Similarly, most adolescents, however, are using this, for communication, but such devices as Facebook, what’s up, messengers are not right to communicate in actual manner. As the result, we have been losing controls, because of detrimental impacts from such breakthroughs.
On the other hand, it is important to consider that high-tech progression have been playing a significant role in human lives. Among from these roles, it is facilitating us to communicate each other from long distance. For example, my sister lives in America. Therefore, I need to call onto America as frequently. So, we can talk to each other like a physical, thanks to scientific improvements.
In conclusion, however computer and other screens are affecting to us, if we manage time from what we have done, we will claim far more benefits.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-28 | Enkhamgalan | 61 | view |
- The graphs below provide information on global population figures and figures for urban populations in different world regions.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.Dis 67
- China food consumption 56
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The graph below shows the number of books read by men and women at Burnaby Public Library from 2011 to 2014.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where r 78
- Compare the advantages and disadvantages of three of the following as media for communicating information. State which you consider to be the most effective.Comics, books, radio, television, film, theaterGive reasons for your answer and include any releva 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, similarly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37786259542 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13567911915 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.629770992366 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4968601742 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.642857143 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127649194737 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429861310376 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0293822678992 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.075066679557 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0152669587699 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.