The city of Brandfield. City planners have decided to build a new shopping mall for the area, and two sites, S1 and S2 have been proposed.
In the map above we can see the proposed plan for building the shopping mall in two sites which was proposed by the city planners for the city of Brandfield. The map also gives more context about the area in which the proposed malls would be built. We could take a look at the ecology of the sites and how it would be either improved or disturbed.
Site S1, seems to be a very ideal site for byilding a shopping mall as it encompassed by the resendential housing estate, the public place of city centre and decently distanct from the industrial estate. We can also see the presence of a river just beside the proposed site. Which gives a lot of opportunnities for the city planners for landscaping. Setting up a shopping mall at this location would make is more accessible to the people resulting in the mall being profiatble and the place turing into a social gathering hub.
However the site S2, doesn't seem to be a wise choice due to it's sheer geographical constraints and the lack of ease in accessing the mall. The proposed site is surrounded by roads on two sides and a railway track on the third. Also, the mall seems to be distant from the residential complex which might not encourage the people in frequently visiting the mall. Additionally the site is in the vicinity of the idustrial estate. It is unclear of environmental impacts on the site.
Overall, the sites need to be reviewed and evaluated on the pros and cons for each of them. The S1 seems to be the obvious consideration however there might be certain unknowns regarding the economical impacts on such a ideal site and other unknown factors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-21 | RahulEdara9 | 67 | view |
| 2021-01-25 | chathurika | 73 | view |
| 2021-01-25 | chathurika | 67 | view |
| 2020-11-09 | pris | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-20 | 81206Ecema | 73 | view |
- The proportion of monthly household income five European countries spend on food and drink housing clothing and entertainment
- An ancient traditional remedy for insomnia the scent of lavender flowers has now been proved effective In a recent study 30 volunteers with chronic insomnia slept each night for three weeks on lavender scented pillows in a controlled room where their slee 59
- The proportion of monthly household income five European countries spend on food and drink housing clothing and entertainment
- The city of Brandfield City planners have decided to build a new shopping mall for the area and two sites S1 and S2 have been proposed 67
- The chart and table below show the average number of children born to one woman and the average age of women when they had their first child in two countries between 1920 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... turing into a social gathering hub. However the site S2, doesnt seem to be a wise c...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 22, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... gathering hub. However the site S2, doesnt seem to be a wise choice due to its she...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 362, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Additionally,
...people in frequently visiting the mall. Additionally the site is in the vicinity of the idus...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 219, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...egarding the economical impacts on such a ideal site and other unknown factors. ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, look, regarding, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1337.0 965.302439024 139% => OK
No of words: 289.0 196.424390244 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62629757785 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65586656884 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 106.607317073 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505190311419 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 416.7 283.868780488 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6287145539 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6428571429 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.92857142857 5.23603664747 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316644935628 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113196657288 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104296760117 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197968218355 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0958678534715 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.