Comparison of Energy Production. The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in 2 years.
The 2 diagrams compare the amount of four various kinds of energy produced in France in 1995 and 2005.
Overall, France has increased its production of every energy overtime except for one, which is Petro. Moreover, Gas, Petro and Coal seems to be the top produced energy by the country in both periods.
Years 1995 and 2005 show Coal as the leading energy abundantly made with 29.80% and 30.93% respectively out of the total percentage of the produced energy by France. It is then followed by Gas with 29.63% in the first year shown and 30.31% in 2005. Petro production ranked 3rd in both years; however, it declined by 9.72% in the latter year.
Nuclear energy on the other hand was least produced in both years while it had the most increased rate of 3.70% after 10 years, compared to the other two mentioned above which only had less than 2% growth.
There were also other produced energy not mentioned specifically but also grew with more than 5% after 10 years.
- Causes of Worldwide Land Degradation 77
- Big is salary is much more important than job satisfaction. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- Estimated Sales of Jeans in Turkey and Their Projected Market Share 73
- The diagrams below give information on transport and car use in Edmonton. 56
- World Population by Region 1900 and 2000 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The 2 diagrams compare the amount of fou...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...produced in France in 1995 and 2005. Overall, France has increased its produc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ergy by the country in both periods. Years 1995 and 2005 show Coal as the lea...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eclined by 9.72% in the latter year. Nuclear energy on the other hand was lea...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... which only had less than 2% growth. There were also other produced energy no...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, while, except for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 809.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73099415205 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26274230435 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619883040936 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9280603085 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.125 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.875 5.23603664747 208% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207432951688 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0976778546491 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519345672809 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122150363609 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368572855033 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.