Causes of Worldwide Land Degradation
The pie chart shows how worldwide land was damaged and the table presents the proportion of land destructed in three different regions namely, North America, Europe and Oceania in the year 1990.
Looking first at the pie chart, it is evident that the most significant cause of land degradation worldwide was over-grazing, contributing to 35% of total destruction. Next to it was deforestation, which was just 5% below over-grazing. Over-cultivation then presents as the third cause of why agricultural land became less productive in 1990, which was just over a quarter. Lastly, an insignificant number of 7% came from other causes not specifically mentioned.
Now looking at the table above, it presents more detailed pieces of information about the percentage of land by region, affected by the three major land manipulation. Overall, Europe had 23% of its land damaged, having the most area ruined among the three regions, with deforestation as the leading cause of damage. Oceania came next with about 13% of its land harmed having deforestation as the main reason of destruction. Lastly, North America had the least area damaged, with just 5% of their land mostly being over-cultivated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-02 | chiragmb | 67 | view |
| 2021-06-25 | Springlovers | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | sivasankar | 89 | view |
| 2018-06-12 | Rochak | 67 | view |
- Estimated Sales of Jeans in Turkey and Their Projected Market Share 73
- Number of Students in a Kaplan International College in the UK in 2009 56
- Average Household Expenditures by Major Categories 90
- Big is salary is much more important than job satisfaction. Do you agree or disagree? 67
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, lastly, look, so, then, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1006.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 191.0 196.424390244 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26701570681 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1267461063 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591623036649 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3854018203 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.777777778 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.13902439024 615% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328830643173 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128517621814 0.103423049105 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0910254563387 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209529684734 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411904923607 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.