Consumer spending on different items in five countries
The table illustrates the consumer expenditure on various elements in 5 nations in 2004.
Overall, the spending on food, drinks and tobacco was highest in 5 countries, then by clothing and footwear, leisure and education. Turkey has the percentage on food, drinks and tobacco as well as leisure and education both rank first in the table while the figure of leisure and education on Spain was the lowest.
The percentage of spending on food, beverages and tobacco in Turkey was the highest of 32,14%, followed by Ireland with 28,91% and Spain with 18,80%. The expenditures on clothing and footwear of these countries were relatively similar of 6,63%, 6,43% and 6,51%, respectively. Turkish use 4,35% of their budget on leisure and education, compares with 2,21% of Irish and 1,98% of Spanish.
Italy and Sweden were 2 countries spend the least amount of money on food, drinks and tobacco with 16,36% and 15,77%. These figures of leisure and education however were similar high of 3,2% and 3,22%, respectively. Italian use a lot of money on clothing and footwear with 9,00%, compares with only 5,4% of Swedish.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-23 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2024-04-30 | Ahmad_off | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | .zin@ | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-25 | MiaMia_8786 | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-18 | minthu vũ | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005 73
- Marriages in America 67
- The table and pie charts show the number of research students in Australian universities in 2001 and 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 33
- The table shows the worldwide market share of the mobile phone market for manufacturers in the years 2005 and 2006.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, then, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 6.8 265% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 937.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09239130435 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61782257569 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494565217391 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 266.4 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6847330571 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.111111111 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0884320832382 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408567669939 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0406021258272 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0601496168704 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0175464816343 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.