places where people gain access to the Internet between 1998 and 2004
The bar chart gives information of the places where people gain access to the Internet between 1998 and 2004.
Overall, the proportion of users connecting to the Internet from home and library remained relatively constant from 1998 to 2004. Meanwhile, 2 other places had the number of users declined throughout the same period. Besides, home was the most commonly Internet access place.
The percentage of people access to the Internet from home were the highest of over 50% in 1998. By contrast, this rate of people who used Internet at library was the lowest of 10%. Approximately 27% of users connected to the Internet at work, compare to 20% at college.
The proportion of people gaining access to the Internet from home went down to about 45% in 2000 then steadily rose up to precisely 55% in 2004. Users connected to the Internet when they were at work remained relatively steady from 1998 to 2002 then fell sharply to about 10% in 2004. The figure of college was similar to those of work but it only dipped slightly from 20% in 2002 to about 18% in 2004. The data of library was pretty steady with slightly fluctuating in 8 years and reach over 12% in 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-05 | hannah14032002 | 27 | view |
| 2023-01-05 | hannah14032002 | 11 | view |
| 2022-09-15 | trachanhkhongmat | 82 | view |
| 2022-09-15 | trachanhkhongmat | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-15 | trachanhkhongmat | 73 | view |
- The following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of films produced by 5 different countries in 3 years 73
- The graph below gives information about total oil use of 4 main consumers from 2009 to 2030 67
- Consumer spending on different items in five countries 61
- The charts below show population statistics in two countries of the UK from 1700 to 2000 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 424, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[7]
Message: Possible agreement error. You should probably use: 'were'.
Suggestion: were
... about 18% in 2004. The data of library was pretty steady with slightly fluctuating...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 970.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70873786408 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41296807495 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495145631068 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 283.5 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.9007949025 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.1818181818 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7272727273 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.27272727273 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.437849754498 0.215688989381 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.184224454225 0.103423049105 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.188205335518 0.0843802449381 223% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.345587451293 0.15604864568 221% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.221904069021 0.0819641961636 271% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.