The charts below show the main reasons for study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The first bar chart illustrates why students from different age groups study and the second graph demonstrates the amount of support which employers give to them.
Overall, the younger the students are, the more they study for career than for interest and vice versa. The employer’s support to them however fluctuated by age groups and students who are under 26 years old received the largest amount of help.
It could be seen from the first chart that the percentage of students under 26 years old who study for career accounts for precisely 80%. This proportion of student who are from 26 to 29 years old declined to 70%. As the age increases, the figure continues to gradually fall to the lowest of nearly 20% of students over 49 years old. By contrast, older students tend to study for interest more than career with exactly 70% students over 49 years old and only 10% students under 26 years old.
Students of the young and old ages are obviously received more supports from employers than middle-age students. Over 60% of students under 26 are supported, this number is a little bit lower of 50% to student from 26 to 29 years old. Almost 40% student from 40 to 49 years old and approximately 45% student over 49 get the support from employers. Students of 30 to 39 years old received the least amount of support with only over 30% students get them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-27 | noor salah | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-02 | Simranjot | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-17 | Minh Pham | 67 | view |
| 2018-09-08 | PS4pro | 73 | view |
| 2017-07-27 | Anh_nguyen | 73 | view |
- The graph below gives information about total oil use of 4 main consumers from 2009 to 2030 67
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 82
- The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 Europe countries from 2000 to 2012 77
- Imprisonment statistic 61
- The methods used by international students when booking the online English courses in three different countries in 2009 and 2010 46
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 176, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...nder 26 are supported, this number is a little bit lower of 50% to student from 26 to 29 y...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1133.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 240.0 196.424390244 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72083333333 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46953310365 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458333333333 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.577756523 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.0 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8181818182 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36363636364 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22679695221 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120482804779 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0504305099864 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183958610858 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394086571806 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.