the consumption of Australian teenagers
The given gragh illustrates how much pre-prepared food was consumed by youngsters in Australian over the 25-year period from 1975 to 2000.
Overall, while both Hamburgers and Pizza indicated an upward trend, a reverse pattern can be seen to Fish and Chips throughout the period shown.
As can be seen from the gragh that although the consumption of Hamburgers and Pizza experienced the same starting point at approximately 10 times among Australian teenagers in the year 1975, Hamburgers finally became the top scorer, which was nearly fourfold that of its at the begining. Similarly, the consumption of Pizza grew substantially to over 80 times in the year 1995 before hitting the plateau in the remainder of the period.
In contrast to the times that the youth ate Pizza and Hamburgers, in 1975, Fish held the first rank with 100 times before seeing a significantly fluctuating fall to 40 times making itself the last at the end of the period. Additionally, after having showed a fluctuation in the vicinity of 70 times during the period of ten years between 1975 and 1985, Fish and Chips lost its momentum and continuosly dropped to 40 times in 2000.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-11-12 | wholemilk | 73 | view |
2024-09-19 | hien3112 | 84 | view |
2024-08-14 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
2024-06-19 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 82 | view |
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 89
- this gragh below shows the percentage of Auastralian exports to four countries from 1990 to 2010 89
- the consumption of Australian teenagers 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Overall, while both Hamburgers and Pizza indicated an upward trend, a reverse pat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, if, similarly, while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 964.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94358974359 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80397951449 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569230769231 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 272.7 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.6873666083 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.666666667 112.824112599 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.5 22.9334400587 142% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 5.23603664747 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122625100589 0.215688989381 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0603707799623 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733652647547 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0725054543106 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0880604048974 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 13.2329268293 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.