Describe the table and pie chart below which shows the spending habits of teenagers in Australia. The table shows the amount of dolllars spent on various activities per week while the pie chart shows amount spent on education.
The given tabular chart reveals, the expenditure on four curricular activities such as; clothes, cosmetics, entertainment, food in three consecutive years, and the pie chart shows the spenditure on education by Australian teenagers. The data is calibrated in currency and per centum. It is clear and coherent representation.
Overall, it is evident that youngsters spend more money on books but in case of curricular activities, the highest amount spent was on food.
It is worth noticing rhat expenditure on clothes increased only by 2 dollars from 2001 to 2003 whereas, on cosmetics, firstly by 10 and then 2 dollars in 2002 and 2003 respectively. Amount spent on entertainment raised by 5 dollars in cosecutive years and on food by 10 dollars in 2002 but remained same in 2003.
Interestingly, it is clear from the given pie chart, teenagers spent 55 percent of money on books, which is their majority spenditure on education. Moreover, they spent 24, 18 and 3 percent on internets, projects and membership respectively.
- The table below gives information on internet use in six categories by age groups full. Describe the information in the table and make comparison where appropriate. 89
- The given diagram shows the process of making water clock. 73
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the silkworm and stages in the production of the Silk Cloth. 84
- Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots. Why do you think it is happening? It is negative or positive development. 61
- Some people believe that social media sites such as Facebook or Twitter have a negative impact on young people and their ability to form personal relationships Others believe that these sites bring people together in a beneficial way 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, moreover, then, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 867.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22289156627 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21258344766 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596385542169 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.386127339 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.375 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237061272236 0.215688989381 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835922673747 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072651035582 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127722388494 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0557940886245 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.