Some people think it is good thing for senior management positions to have very high salaries compared to other workers of the same company or organisation. To what extent you agree?
"Money is just like sea water, the more we drink the thirstier we become". Peopledo hard work to earn money but their salaries varies with their field and positions. Today's topic reveals, higher authorities pool in more money than employees at lower position of similar organisation; Is it right or not? I will set forth some reasons with examples and give my opinion by the end.
It is transparent that people who are positioned at higher status in an organisation have high salaries due to their skill, a simple employeecannot perform the tasks which an authorised person skillfully performs. The difference between innovative ideas of both the type of workers broaden the gap of their earnings. Take, for example, Steve jobs the developer of "Macintosh", he earns more money than the employees who work in his company, only because of the time and ideas he devotes to his company which differs him from other staff members. Moreover, no member can match the skills he have to run a large organisation.
Another thing which bolster my point of view is responsibilities, which makes the person multi-tasking and enhances the quality of leadership due to which variations in salaries are evident, hardwork is the only reason behind posh life of a person who is at higher authorities. A recent survey was conducted by Harvard University in America which stated that nearly about 95 percent of people supported the idea of discrimination in salaries according to the positions in companies.
Summing up my points in the essay, I completely agree with this topic . I believe that everyone should get what he/she deserves according to the contribution they put into their jobs. Since, every job do not requires same skill and hardwork, therefore, salaries should also be distributed according to requirements of jobs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-28 | Nicolas | 84 | view |
| 2019-06-27 | Lê Võ Nhật Quang | 89 | view |
| 2018-10-04 | honza | 11 | view |
| 2018-08-17 | drtruong92 | 89 | view |
| 2018-07-31 | eyraen | 84 | view |
- The maps below show an island before and after the construction of some tourist facilities 87
- Polygamy has lead to massive divorce rate around the globe. Give possible solution and discuss the reasons behind the issue? 56
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the silkworm and stages in the production of the Silk Cloth. 84
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007. 78
- Some people say that self-employment is better than working for a company or institution. Discuss both points of view. What is your opinion? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 601, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...over, no member can match the skills he have to run a large organisation. Another...
^^^^
Line 7, column 70, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ssay, I completely agree with this topic . I believe that everyone should get what...
^^
Line 7, column 129, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to accord'.
Suggestion: to accord
...veryone should get what he/she deserves according to the contribution they put into their...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 209, Rule ID: DONT_NEEDS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'require'?
Suggestion: require
...nto their jobs. Since, every job do not requires same skill and hardwork, therefore, sal...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, another thing, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16053511706 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07776795025 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642140468227 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.1872769021 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.692307692 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07692307692 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.149713514428 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463163433455 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0258323157295 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0785970979476 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029028351293 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.