The diagram below shows the average hours of unpaid work per week done by people in different categories. (Unpaid work refers to such activities as childcare in the home, housework and gardening.)
The bar chart compares the number of hours that married men and women spend weekly on household chores and child care, as a function of family size. Three family sizes are shown: no children, one or two children, and three or more.
Overall, women contribute many more hours than men, and the gap grows with family size. Regardless of the number of children, the men work about the same number of hours, while the number of hours women spends increases.
In detail, in childless families, women work nearly one and a half times more hours than men, 30 hours versus 18 hours, a difference of 12 hours per week. When there are one or two children, the total hours of work increase from 48 to 70, and three-quarters of it (52 hours) is done by the women. Thus women work as hard in these families as the man and woman together do in a childless family. The situation is about the same for larger families in that the women do all the additional work around the house, 55 out of 72 hours.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-26 | Ducc Minh | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-17 | beauty flowers | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-17 | beauty flowers | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-15 | beauty flowers | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-28 | Sayansh Garg | 73 | view |
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status 89
- The line graph below gives information about the rates of unemployment between 1991 and 2005 in three different countries in Europe The table shows the percentage of men and women in the workforce in these three countries 73
- The charts below show the Medical research funding amount in millions of Dollars in Someland and also shows the death number for this area 73
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 296, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...rs of it 52 hours is done by the women. Thus women work as hard in these families as...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 807.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.43406593407 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.2886511669 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549450549451 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6502227946 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.875 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145373617998 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717310054408 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544000845198 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956656038339 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0644231467672 0.0819641961636 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.71 11.4140731707 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.9 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.