The diagram below shows the changes of an island between 1990 and now.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The presented map indicates the renovation of an island from 1990 to present.
Overall, the local has been modified radically over the period. Specifically, lands have been channeled into accommodations, whereas its accessibility has been also facilitated.
Turning into detail, regarding to infrastructure, the island used to be totally primitive with only trees distributed on both the western and eastern edge. However, at present, although they still remain, the western ones have been surrounded by new accommodations, while the eastern ones have a proximity to another erected building block. In addition, at the heart of the island, a reception centre has been built, along with a new restaurant to the northern part.
Regarding to traffic, the entire region becomes more approachable for visitors thanks to the construction of a pier in the south, which is connected to island centre by a vehicle track. Furthermore, it is also this road, which runs through the reception and leads to the restaurant, makes transportation between these locations possible. Meanwhile, apartments are connected to each other by circular footpaths, which also have a branch to the beach.
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The population of many cities is growing rapidly What are the effects on people living in these cities What can be done to maintain the quality of life of these people 89
- In many countries imprisonment is the most common solution to crimes However some people believe that better education will be a more effective solution To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- The graph shows the information about the international conferences in three capital cities in 1980 – 2010.Summarise the main character and make comparison where relevant. 78
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, still, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52459016393 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13473602054 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644808743169 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7921561087 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.333333333 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.55555555556 5.23603664747 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0692119786607 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0296313261353 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369465406508 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0485584614395 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434498658393 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.