The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now.
The given picture illustrates how a central library has changed over the course of 20 years.
Generally, all previous areas of the library were transformed to offer diverse services besides book-related activities, resulting in the disappearance of several facilities and the introduction of new ones. However, the total size of the library remained unchanged.
In the Western part of the library, there was a replacement of the old reading room with a computer room. Besides, the area devoted to adult fiction books is now filled with all reference books. Moreover, the room used for the storage of CDs, videos and computer games became a larger room where storytelling events are held and children’s fiction books can be found.
In the updated design, two sets of tables and chairs were put in the middle of the library. Meanwhile, in the East, children’s books were taken out to make room for lectures while an information desk and self-service machines were added to the space used for adult fiction books. Finally, there was the construction of a cafe in the same area as the old enquiry desk.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-06-26 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-24 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 67 | view |
| 2024-05-14 | 123456abcxyz | 11 | view |
| 2024-05-14 | 123456abcxyz | 11 | view |
- Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child s development while others think that it is important for children to go to school Discuss the advantages of both methods and give your own opinion 73
- More tasks at home and work are being done by robots Do the pros outweigh the cons 84
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 81
- The line graph shows visits to and from the UK from 1979 to 1999 and the bar graph shows the most popular countries visited by UK residents in 1999 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, however, moreover, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 928.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04347826087 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80325222953 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614130434783 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5959545545 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.111111111 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0625229393091 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0310955232735 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457485021223 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0544844308043 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559314647605 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.