The diagram below shows the number of landline telephone per 1000 people in different countries over a five-year period.
The given diagram illustrate the information about over the five year of 2000 to 2004, how much number of landline telephones per thousand people in a different countries.
Firstly, I can see the total nine countries landline telephone ownership data available and in that singapor shot up at the beginning of the year 2000 and remained unchanged through the year of 2002 about above the 450 per 1000 people then it was drop down by 25 numbers in the year of 2004. Altogether, The Brunei darussauam at the 250 per 1000 people in the year 2000 and remain stable in the year 2002 but this was also call by approx 25 numbers in the year of 2004. However, the lowest trend of telephone ownership at Indonesia, lao PDR and Thailand because it was almost vanished to use of landline telephone in the year of 2004. And remained countries lead bottom of the 100 per 1000 masses. Which was combodia, Myanmar, Philippines and the last one was vitenam.
To paraphrase, The all seven country people gradually reducing the usage of landline telephone except two country combodia and Vietnam. They have more users in the year 2000 as compared to the year of 2000 and 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-06 | sivasankar | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | ps777777777777777 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | Jeheb | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | Mohamad Alen Aliansyah | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows the number of landline telephone per 1000 people in different countries over a five-year period. 67
- The diagram below shows the percentage of deaths from heart disease and cancer, and calories consumed from processed foods in different countries Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'country'?
Suggestion: country
...ones per thousand people in a different countries. Firstly, I can see the total nine...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 424, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'called'.
Suggestion: called
...able in the year 2002 but this was also call by approx 25 numbers in the year of 200...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73039215686 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49607053739 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53431372549 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.0034110096 43.030603864 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.625 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405424882184 0.215688989381 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17970292119 0.103423049105 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115319654383 0.0843802449381 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.298030624376 0.15604864568 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0875451315869 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.