The diagram below shows the results of a questionnaire showing how many times teenagers in Australia use an iPod in a week to play videos in 2009.
Given is the pie chart illustrating the survey of how often young Australians played videos on the iPod per week around 2009.
It is clear from the graph that the majority of people not wanting to use this item for playing videos. By contrast, spending 6 to 10 times watching videos was the category receiving the least proportion.
In 2009, the number of people who did not rely on the iPod for the purpose of playing videos was highest, at 51%, while the smallest proportion of 5% caused by 6 to 10 times weekly. Meanwhile, setting aside one time a week to use the iPod made up 14% during the researched time.
While the percentage of Australians using the iPod twice time a week was 15%, users played videos on the iPod at 3 to 5 times and over 11 times weekly were negatively correlated, at only 9% and 6% respectively, which were significantly lower than the others.
- Nowadays sport is becoming a big business with high earnings for professional sportspeople and a lot of companies have involved in financially and in other ways Is it a positive or negative development of sport 78
- It is better for college students to live far away from home than live at home with their parents Do you agree or disagree 92
- In many countries today insufficient respect is shown to older people. What do you think may be the reasons for this? What problems might this cause in society? 56
- The best way to increase employees' job satisfaction is to increase their salaries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 723.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57594936709 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59929396451 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.626582278481 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 216.0 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6612213382 43.030603864 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3333333333 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.5 5.23603664747 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290879104921 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14272444478 0.103423049105 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552037127368 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180481724703 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0442160964067 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.