Some people say that education system is the only critical factor to development of a country. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes argued that the key to a developed country is well-educated. While I strongly agree with this point of view, I do not believe that education is the only reason to make a country develop.
On the one hand, it is no doubt that training is the main area predisposing to prosperity. Firstly, a good education will ensure that people can easily help in development. People are talented but if there is a lack of education, they cannot prove them much more; therefore, education plays a vital role in a developed world to help people prove the thinking of past scientists. Secondly, education is the driving force for the national development and economic growth are very strongly depends on education and these both are playing a great role in developing a country. For example, if one got an education then he is able to a better job then a labour’s work. He is able to do a government job or any other private job and can show their skills which are helpful in developing a country. Hence it is the education which can lead a person from poverty into prosperity.
On the other hand, the welfare of the nation cannot derive from one factor. One reason is improving a country many resources are also needed. For instance, the industry is also very important in this regard, if all people are educated but they remain idle, then it is not helpful for a country. Another reason is justice, which is also taken into account a wealthy nation. For example, if people observe the basic rules of life, this would contribute to the development of a country even a little. Nowadays almost everywhere authority would be corrupt and does not speak well for the country people are in; it influences the development of a population and their education. All in all, except education a country need many qualities for its development.
In conclusion, while I believe the better education system is much more crucial in a strong developed country, I do disagree that only one factor cannot contribute a nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-20 | sam@08 | 69 | view |
| 2021-07-14 | Chinkiarora | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-06 | Tanveersingh97 | 61 | view |
| 2020-07-08 | vinay_vp372 | 82 | view |
| 2020-06-20 | blancnat | 73 | view |
- The graph below compares figures for the production and consumption of energy in the US from 1950 to 2000 It also predicts figures for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 62
- The diagram below give information about two road tunnels in one Australian city 92
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- The graph below shows the unemployment figures amongst women of different age groups. 56
- The diagram below shows the results of a questionnaire showing how many times teenagers in Australia use an iPod in a week to play videos in 2009 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 798, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ch are helpful in developing a country. Hence it is the education which can lead a pe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1672.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77714285714 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7618922824 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485714285714 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1166883862 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.3529411765 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5882352941 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35294117647 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253096531433 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798411365568 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733038696168 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186027939458 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0675596753175 0.056905535591 119% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.