The diagram shows the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagram illustrates how West Park Secondary school construction changed over the years starting from 1950. Overall, the picture showcases the transition of the area geographically
from year 1950 to 1980 and further to 2010.
Initially, in the year 1950, the West Park blueprint shows that it is divided into four sections parallel to the main road. These sectors were comprised of School, houses, farmland and playground with 25% each.
making a full 100% coverage area. Furthermore, in the year 1980, we saw that school partition had their main building constructed. Moreover, the house part were distributed partially into two equal halves
geographically comprising of Car park and Science block area. At this point, the farmland area was replaced by sports field next to playground which had no changes since 1950.
In 2010, a lot of changes happened in location unlike the earlier years. The car park took 75% of the space which in turn led to shrinking of the sports field to approximately 20%.The sports field was now
a part of the fourth partition where playground area occupies only 80% of the space. Over the glance, there was no constructional change on the main road space.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-10 | vanditaverma.v@gmail.com | view |
- Some think increasing business and cultural contact between nations is positive Others think it leads to the disappearance of the national identity Discuss both views and state your own opinion 84
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town 73
- The table below shows the figures in thousand for imprisonment in five countries between 1930 and 1980 56
- The chart below shows the proportion of male and female students studying six art related subjects at a UK university in 2011
- The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: WERE_COMPRISED_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprised' or 'were composed of'?
Suggestion: comprised; were composed of
...arallel to the main road. These sectors were comprised of School, houses, farmland and playground...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Making
...farmland and playground with 25% each. making a full 100% coverage area. Furthermore,...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: COMPRISING_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprising' or 'consisting of'?
Suggestion: comprising; consisting of
...y into two equal halves geographically comprising of Car park and Science block area. At thi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 149, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...by sports field next to playground which had no changes since 1950. In 2010, a...
^^
Line 9, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ears. The car park took 75% of the space which in turn led to shrinking of the sp...
^^
Line 9, column 182, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...f the sports field to approximately 20%.The sports field was now a part of the fo...
^^^
Line 9, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...proximately 20%.The sports field was now a part of the fourth partition where pla...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, moreover, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1009.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12182741117 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74085353126 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624365482234 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.807208688 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7272727273 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9090909091 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.09090909091 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 3.83414634146 183% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217022317586 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844687353531 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738713921916 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101254878886 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590853017704 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.