The figure illustrates the main varieties of writing systems used all around the world.
It is clear that there are five main types of writing systems adopted by most countries in the world. Characters in different systems are created in different ways accordingly.
The first is logograohic system where one character means one word. Chinese is a representative of this writing system. It is noticeable that same writing system can be used by languages even if they are different in spoken form. For example, both Chinese and Japanese use logographic system while Syllabic system is used in Japanese as well. This writing systems feature one syllable forms one character. Kana is another instance of syllabic system.
The other three systems are related to pronunciation. In alphabetic system, one character corresponds to one vowel or constant sound. English belongs to this system. It should be noted that exact match of spelling and pronunciation is not always possible. In contrast, only one consonant sound matches one character in abjad system and one character go with one consonant and one vowel sound in abjuda system. Abrabic is behalf of the former and Indian and Devanagari are examples of the latter. Particularly, the first type of sound-based writing system is abjad.
- the graphs show changes in the spending habits of people in the UK between 1971 and 2001 Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data 73
- The diagrams show the structure of solar panel and its use 67
- Convenience foods will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 67
- The flow chart illustrates the consequences of deforestation Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Many university students want to learn about different subjects in addition to their main subjects Others feel it is more important to give all their time and attention to studying for their qualification Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, first, if, so, well, while, for example, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25603864734 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80066604735 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550724637681 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.2798325431 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 68.0 112.824112599 60% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.9375 22.9334400587 56% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.0625 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 13.0 4.09268292683 318% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231541541547 0.215688989381 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0955021065467 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0837346308968 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197974056176 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0857881701132 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 61.2550243902 83% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 10.3012195122 89% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.34 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.