The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950

Essay topics:

The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950.

Here, we have set of three maps. Maps are spells out the information pertaining the changes of West park secondary school since 1950, 1980 and 2010.
Overall, in 1950, there have few facilities available. However, following to the years there have established new things for that local people.
Firstly, in this three years, that west park secondary school connected with main road. In 1950, there have four things, houses, school, farmland and playground. However, in 1980, that was improved and created new design compare to past years. They added science block, car park, which is next to school, which was converted to main building. Playground at there but they established sports field in the space of farmland.
In 2010, they are changed again and car park has been going down and established at next to sports field. However, they decrease playground and sports field area to set car park, which is bigger compare to past years. The space of car park has been empty to create new facilities in the future

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-12-01 SUSANNA PETROSYAN 73 view
2023-10-07 Kshitij Kasabekar view
2023-08-20 shakhzodakarimova 61 view
2022-11-16 Johndavisvu 78 view
2022-08-23 mehulbakhshi2 67 view
Essays by user wetemporary :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, second

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 874.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91011235955 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31662397098 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52808988764 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.3061725052 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.2307692308 112.824112599 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.6923076923 22.9334400587 60% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 2.76923076923 5.23603664747 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255334594571 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987335106168 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0782806957872 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168775235818 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811275575756 0.0819641961636 99% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.2329268293 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 83.66 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.8 10.3012195122 47% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.77 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.4329268293 44% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 5.0 11.0658536585 45% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.