Give are the two maps comparing the transformations of the town, Pebbleton from 20 years before and to the present day.
Perceptibly, the outlook of the region has diametrically changed with more residential house and more access to pedestrian-friendly amenities.
In the past, the town was divided into three areas: the center in the northeast, the seafront and the south side of the river. To begin with the center, simply had houses as well as few trees. In the northwest corner seen from the center, the place was for old fort as well as lighthouse. Following the seafront was a film studio and the playing field which is located in the southern part. Additionally,a road bridge was the only way to go to school to the south of the river.
After two decades, there was the mushrooming of housing and appearance new community centre is built next to it. The old fort has been replaced with a children’s playground though the lighthouse remains unchanged. On the south side of the community centre and behind the light lane, build a new tennis court that links with a footpath which is connected to the school along with coast road and the other side of a small river. The seafront of this region experienced drastic changes such as a former film studio on the southwestern tip of the peninsula is presently a block of flats.
- The graph shows Japanese average monthly salary Yen from 1953 to 1983 and the prices of black and white television and color television during the same period 67
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people Agree or disagree 56
- The diagram shows how ketchup is made 78
- The graph below shows a typical American and a Japanese office Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 403, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , a
...cated in the southern part. Additionally,a road bridge was the only way to go to s...
^^
Line 4, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...en replaced with a children’s playground though the lighthouse remains unchanged....
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, well, as for, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1101.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74568965517 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82139974516 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547413793103 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.8996064002 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.090909091 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0909090909 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.27272727273 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0388784911102 0.215688989381 18% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0145538525483 0.103423049105 14% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0136586497707 0.0843802449381 16% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0207310345319 0.15604864568 13% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0127932018359 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.