The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
All three maps show changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School over the time from 1950 to 2010.
Overall, it is clear from the diagrams that the school and its premises have changed a lot. Till 1980, there was no car parking and science block building, sports field were also developed beside school building. From the 2010 map, we can notice some major rearrangements of all entities.
It is evident from the 1980 map that the car parking, science block and sports field developed near the school area while a number of houses and farmland removed from the area. Additionally, the former school building also converted into the main building of the school. While with all these changes, the playground didn't change at all till 1980.
Turning to the second map of 2010, there are not any new buildings developed but instead, the earlier buildings are relocated and their boundaries have changed. For instance, the location of car parking is not similar to that of 1980 as now, it has a larger area. Subsequently, the size of sports field and playground have been reduced.
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 50
- The following appeared as an editorial in the student newspaper of Groveton College."To combat the recently reported dramatic rise in cheating among college students, colleges and universities should adopt honor codes similar to Groveton's, whic 46
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people whom they serve. 57
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small-business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe."Jazz music is extremely popular in the city of Monroe: over 100,000 people attended Monroe's annual jazz festival las 55
- The given line chart demonstrates the consumption of three spreads, during the period of 1981 to 2007. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 312, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... with all these changes, the playground didnt change at all till 1980. Turning t...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, second, so, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 919.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96756756757 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38356927392 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610810810811 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2112554578 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.9 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190394107852 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0841977744685 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100979053611 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148852074104 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116562055544 0.0819641961636 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.