The diagrams demonstrate the coastel countryside of Seaville in 1980 and 2010 and prescribe diverse modernizations between them.
Overall, although the village was adequate to dwell affordably in 1980, various changes was observed during the year of 2010. For example, woodland was turned into the golf course as well as holiday cottages where permanent houses was constructed instead of it completely by 2010.
Initially, we are able to analyze that plenty of upgrades like retirement village or boat club helped improve and attract people by the year of 2010. Namely, the space where was located in the center of that village, was filled fully with some types of accommodations. Immutable houses were constructed instead of holiday cottages which were moved to the south-east of the village. After the modernizations of tea room and sand dunes, there were variety of availabilities to reside in the hotel and the restaraunt. Then, East bank was expanded to 4 buildings as well in the year 2010
- The bar chart below shows employment figures in different tourism related industries between 2009 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 57
- The diagrams below show the coastal village of Seaville in 1980 and 2010 78
- The chart shows British Emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Farming is the backbone of every country but nowadays many youngsters hesitate to enter in this profession Why is this the case and what can be done to avoid it 73
- Although more and more people read news on the Internet newspapers will remain the main source for the majority of people To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 25, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The diagrams demonstrate the coastel countryside of Seaville in 1...
^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e diverse modernizations between them. Overall, although the village was adequa...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cted instead of it completely by 2010. Initially, we are able to analyze that p...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, then, well, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16049382716 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86853120423 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623456790123 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.8190325154 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.5 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171005481907 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764076798171 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857270147286 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147289229757 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0831851154845 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.2329268293 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.