As all people know, social networking sites are becoming extensive together with the world. These sites are able to create online communication or find some kind of information around the world. However, most people believe that these types of sites might endanger both individuals and society. Perhaps it is true because of most people`s points. But it is a matter of agreement to find right way on using social networking sites.
On the one hand, social networking sites are being used by every person and they have already become popular. People are able to share their moods and communicate with each other. When it comes to compare them, it is the shadow of virtual life. People can do anything there as they can do in real life. In fact, the stipulation of using social networking sites has multiplied to 25 percent for 5 months because of the quarantine. And I think there might be some positive aspects during using them even though they have variety of drawbacks.
On the other hand, negative impacts exist on embracing social networking sites as many people believe. The main point of negative aspects is dependent on wasting time . They have such power that they attract people to their trap during the period of using them. Together with that it can cause to diminish the relationship in real life. Moreover, one of negative impact and attraction on using these sites is bad currents that deceive and convince people by telling unworthy words. So that, I think it is main negative point on using social networking sites and I agree with this statement.
In conclusion, using social networking sites is wrong way to use and communicate due to wasting time. The most important point is to live with virtue in real life
- The bar chart below shows employment figures in different tourism related industries between 2009 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 57
- The diagrams below show the coastal village of Seaville in 1980 and 2010 78
- The chart shows British Emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Farming is the backbone of every country but nowadays many youngsters hesitate to enter in this profession Why is this the case and what can be done to avoid it 73
- Although more and more people read news on the Internet newspapers will remain the main source for the majority of people To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... way on using social networking sites. On the one hand, social networking sites...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...though they have variety of drawbacks. On the other hand, negative impacts exis...
^^^
Line 3, column 169, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ive aspects is dependent on wasting time . They have such power that they attract ...
^^
Line 3, column 297, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'diminishing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: diminishing
...g them. Together with that it can cause to diminish the relationship in real life. Moreover...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sites and I agree with this statement. In conclusion, using social networking s...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, i think, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86486486486 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50940481779 2.80592935109 89% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513513513514 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 456.3 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.0435892251 49.4020404114 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.7894736842 106.682146367 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5789473684 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42105263158 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286468357736 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910662324929 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735137708247 0.0667982634062 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173797514187 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689064878044 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.0946893788 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.58950901804 84% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.