The diagrams below show the design for a wave energy machine and its location Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The diagrams below show the design for a wave-energy machine and its location.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The two given pictures illustrate the construction of a wave-energy machine and its two situation options.

As can be clearly seen in the first picture, the water enters the machine following the wave direction. There are two ways where the air can go through the machine, the first one is from the top of the machine and the other is from the middle. The airflow makes the two turbines rotate and this generates the electricity.

Considering the wave-energy machine location in the second picture, there are two options which are high installation costs and low installation costs. If people choose to put the wave-energy machine in a place where has large waves, the output will be high. Thus, it will cost much more money. In contrast, if the wave-energy machine is located in a place with small waves, the costs will be surely much lower since the output is low.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-03-05 eyraen 73 view
2023-03-05 eyraen 61 view
2023-02-02 Raspreet s. 11 view
2023-02-02 Raspreet s. view
2023-02-02 Harman97 11 view
Essays by user nhuche2607 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 225, Rule ID: THE_NN_AND_THE_NN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'are'?
Suggestion: are
...om the top of the machine and the other is from the middle. The airflow makes the ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, thus, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 33.7804878049 41% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 723.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 150.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49963551158 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61385198935 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 227.7 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.6210524129 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.375 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192143694893 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0851860511065 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474225130584 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128407298808 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272581606967 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.48 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.