The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant.
The diagrams illustrate the evolutionary timeline of the horse, with detailed examination of its foot anatomy.Overall, it is clear that over the course of 40 million years, horses have gained new physical features, including the development from its feet to modern hooves.
In terms of size, the modern horse is notably larger and more muscular than its ancestors, sporting a more voluminous tail at the end and a mane along its back.
The most striking transformation, however, is seen in the foot structure. 40 million years ago, Eohippus used to walk on four-toed feet. These were reduced to 3 toes with the frontal bone outgrowing the two on the sides as shown by the Mesohippus after 10 million years. Another 15 million years further accentuated the size gap as Merychippus came into existence. Ultimately, modern horses' legs have totally been transformed, with each leg comprising only their much larger singular bone and hoof.
- The plans below show the changes at a small theater in 2010 and 2012 73
- Some people think that children should begin their formal education at a very early age Others think they should begin after 7 years of age Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Intelligence is the most important quality of a leader To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Light pollution excessive light during night time is a form of pollution that distresses many people especially in modern cities What are the causes of light pollution and what solutions can you suggest for governments and businesses to take 89
- Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots Is this a negative or positive development 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ail at the end and a mane along its back The most striking transformation however...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 768.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01960784314 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74973153925 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.679738562092 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 8.94146341463 11% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 153.0 22.4926829268 680% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 43.030603864 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 768.0 112.824112599 681% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 153.0 22.9334400587 667% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.23603664747 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176353685809 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.176353685809 0.103423049105 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0843802449381 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11582733888 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0774712089326 0.0819641961636 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 78.7 13.2329268293 595% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -83.82 61.2550243902 -137% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 6.51609756098 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 63.0 10.3012195122 612% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.02 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.35 8.06136585366 190% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 11.4329268293 499% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 63.2 10.9970731707 575% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 63.0 11.0658536585 569% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.