The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work.
The maps below illustrate the ground floor plan of a house that is proposed to change.
looking at the existing floor plan, there is a kitchen and a living room that is set on the west and the east of the map. In addition, in the middle of the map is a stair that has storage to contain goods. There is an internal wall put parallel to the hall and stairs, which is linked to an internal door on the north of the map.
Regarding the proposed plan changes, the initial impression is kitchen furniture will be added on the left side of them and at the bottom right corner of the kitchen is two internal doors that it is moved down. Moreover, the internal wall on the right of the stairs will be removed, and re-build a new stair on the top of the flat as well as destructive the storage under the stairs
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-05 | vuhieuquy | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-04 | vuhieuquy | 56 | view |
| 2023-02-22 | Ho Mia | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-24 | jadenguyen | 67 | view |
| 2022-09-24 | jadenguyen | 42 | view |
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work 61
- Some people believe that the aging population is good for business the economy and society Other howeve disagree with this view Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work 67
- Many animal species are become extinct due to human activities on land and in sea what are the reasons for this and what can be done to solve this issue 78
- The graph below shows the population of Chile by age group between 1975 and 2035 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Looking
... a house that is proposed to change. looking at the existing floor plan, there is a ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, moreover, regarding, well, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 653.0 965.302439024 68% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.21290322581 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22154805359 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.509677419355 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 195.3 283.868780488 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3198509363 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.833333333 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 5.23603664747 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1959235039 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117615482032 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149654634405 0.0843802449381 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195078149276 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.162137981558 0.0819641961636 198% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.43 11.4140731707 65% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.91 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 20.0 40.7170731707 49% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.