The diagrams below show the floor plans for a trade conference in 2009 and for the same trade conference in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The given pictures describe the differences in the layout for the same trade conference between 2009 and 2010.
Looking at the graphs, it is immediately obvious that the floor plan underwent a number of significant changes. Overall, to be specific, the modification of some facilities moved in tandem with the increase in the quantity of seating and display stands.
In 2009, the exhibition area was located in the lower right corner of the trade conference, next to the balcony. A year later, it was moved towards left where was the previous position of the conference hall and meeting rooms, with more display stands added. The initial exhibition area, at the same time, was used for a new conference hall with five more lines of seating.
A refreshments area in the previous plan was marked near 2 entrances, while the registration stood adjacent to the balcony. In 2010, there was an interchange between these places, and a lounge area was provided in the balcony.
- The graphs give information about average house prices in England and other parts of the world 78
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 80
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 84
- The chart shows the percentage of groups of companies in Australia which used social media for business purposes between 2012 and 2016 78
- The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation 74
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 3, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'refreshments'' or 'refreshment's'?
Suggestion: refreshments'; refreshment's
...all with five more lines of seating. A refreshments area in the previous plan was marked ne...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 784.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67675176286 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56875 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.3584606826 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.0 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198912160231 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896586618081 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940541476658 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133869025767 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115401203507 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 3, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'refreshments'' or 'refreshment's'?
Suggestion: refreshments'; refreshment's
...all with five more lines of seating. A refreshments area in the previous plan was marked ne...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 784.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67675176286 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56875 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 239.4 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 19.3584606826 43.030603864 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.0 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.375 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198912160231 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896586618081 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940541476658 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133869025767 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115401203507 0.0819641961636 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.