The diagrams below show the stages in the development of simple cooking equipment.
The three diagrams illustrate the process of improving cooking device. It is a clear and coherent representation.
Overall, it is evident that there are three different stages in the process, from the initial simple fire to complex equipment; which is used for cooking.
At the first stage, there was simple cooking equipment: pot, which was balanced by three stones over a fire of twigs and grass. In the second diagram, same material were used with a shield which was made of clay, around the fire. It was used to prevent the loss of heat, and protect the fire from wind.
At the final stage, there were many tools which was used for cooking. Fire was enclosed by metal base; which was used to control the heat. There is a door at the front where air can enter and ash can be removed. Charcoal used as fuel. There are also metal support, with the help of this pot can balanced on the stove, and a handle for easy transportation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-02 | farhodyusupov | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-23 | sabrinaaa | 69 | view |
- The diagrams below show the stages in the development of simple cooking equipment 82
- In some countries younger people are loosing their interest in teaching profession. Why is this happening what can be done to improve this situation. 73
- Young people in disturbed economics tend to become violent causing destruction to life and property. What are the causes, impacts and remedies of such problem. 56
- The bar charts below show the marriage and divorce statistics for eight countries in 1981 and 1994. 67
- The graphs below show the weekly earnings of men and women in euros for the 16-59 age groups as per their own education level. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 772.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59523809524 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35015800115 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559523809524 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.807293564 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.1818181818 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2727272727 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.45454545455 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143923986173 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0562968296626 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735931887159 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111092307979 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0527762914059 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.9 13.2329268293 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.81 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.