The diagrams give information about changes in a student accommodation.
The charts depict the modifications to layouts of students’ accommodation building at present and its version 2010.
Overall, there are extensive renovations occurring in the site. These consist of several study-bedroom and additionally construction of loads of new facilities.
It can be noticeable from the charts, in 2010, there was only three study-bedrooms serving for students in the area. However, the accommodation building have expanded two more ones at the moment. As a result, the main horizontal corridor and unique living room were demolished to make a way for those modifications.
In addition, the hall was narrowed significantly because of the expansion of bathroom. Furthermore, the changes make its wall and the vertical corridor being devastated to construct en-suite bathroom. The former kitchen was enlarged to play the role of kitchen and social area. Especially, Parking in the updated layout was built on the original site of garden on the South which connect with the garden in the north.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-21 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-12-20 | khanhkhanhlhp | 78 | view |
| 2024-12-11 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 11 | view |
| 2024-12-08 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-29 | Nguyen Thinh | 84 | view |
- The first graph shows the number of train passengers from 2000 to 2009 the second compares the percentage of trains running on time and target in the period 73
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometers travelled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 78
- The charts show school expenditure and the proportion of students who gained higher education diplomas and degrees in Singapore from 2000 to 2012 67
- The graph gives information about the percentage of people living in Australia who were born in Asia the UK and other regions 73
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 162, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onstruction of loads of new facilities. It can be noticeable from the charts, in...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 862.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4213836478 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14743273464 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660377358491 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.8825260843 43.030603864 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.2 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9 22.9334400587 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0861142630257 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0297030830349 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408269660752 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0540272129253 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468107395533 0.0819641961636 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 61.2550243902 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.