The diagrams show the cross-sections of two tunnels, one joining France and Italy andthe other joining two Japanese islands.

Essay topics:

The diagrams show the cross-sections of two tunnels, one joining France and Italy and
the other joining two Japanese islands.

The figures illustrate the two tunnels’ cross-sections. While figure 1 demonstrates the road tunnel which connects France and Italy together, called the Mont-Blanc, the other describle the railway tunnel linking two islands of the japanese, namely seikan tunnel.

Generally, seikan railway tunnel is longer than the Mont-Blanc road tunnel, and it also took a longer time to construct than the road tunnel.

Particularly, seikan railway, the one joining japanese’s Hokkaido island and the japanese island is 53.85 kilometers long. it was built under the Tsugaru Strait sea with the depth of 240 meters in 42 years from 1946 to 1988. Whereas the Mont-Blanc road tunnel was started to built later in 1957. The construction took only eight years to finished, means that it has being used 34 earlier than the seikan railway. Construting 3.5 kilometers depth under the ground, the Mont-Blanc tunnel’s length is 11,60 kilometers which is shorter, but deeper than the seikan tunnel.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-25 trpg143 61 view
Essays by user trpg143 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...panese island is 53.85 kilometers long. it was built under the Tsugaru Strait sea ...
^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...0 meters in 42 years from 1946 to 1988. Whereas the Mont-Blanc road tunnel was started ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, whereas, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 33.7804878049 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 841.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42580645161 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88074449852 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612903225806 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.4887626261 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.125 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.625 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100587578046 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523264788879 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682329110253 0.0843802449381 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0706695576213 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635412726094 0.0819641961636 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.