The diagrams show the cross-sections of two tunnels, one joining France and Italy and the other joining two Japanese islands.
The two tunnels’ cross-sections is illustrates by the diagrams. While figure 1 describes a road tunnel called Mont-Blanc, which connects French and Italian together, the other demonstrates a railway tunnel namely seikan, which is the connection between Japanese’s Hokkaido Island and Japanese Island.
Generally, it can be seen clearly from the charts that the railway tunnel is longer than the road one, and the constructed time of the seikan tunnel is respectively last longer than the other.
Particularly, the Mont-Blanc tunnel was begun to be built in 1957 which is 11 years after the seikan tunnel started to construct. However, it took only eight years to finish the road tunnel whereas it was not until 1988 that the railway tunnel had been used.
Despite that fact, the seikan was built 240 meters under the sea with 53.85 kilometers long constrasted to the Mont-Blanc with the length of 11.60 kilometers, and the depth of 3.5 kilometers from the top of the mountain.
- Multicultural societies, in which there is a mixture of different ethnic peoples, bring more benefits than drawbacks to a country.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- In many parts of the world people search for family history Some people think that finding for the previous generations is a thing to do but others think that it is better to be focus on present and future generations Discuss both views and show your opin 76
- Nowadays, the traditions and customs relating to the food we eat and the way we eat are changing. Why is it happening? Do you think this kind of change is positive or negative? 56
- The charts below show the percentage of men and women in different weight groups in England between 1993 and 2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 841.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22360248447 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87415942628 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60248447205 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.9722157892 43.030603864 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.166666667 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0737676064605 0.215688989381 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535297300567 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762107838499 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0447680462549 0.15604864568 29% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0543709041873 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.85 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.