The diagrams show the cross-sections of two tunnels, one joining France and Italy and the other joining two Japanese Islands.
The diagrams present the cross-sections of two tunnels. Figure 1 describes a road tunnel linking 2 European countries, while Figure 2 illustrates a railway tunnel connecting two islands in Japan.
In general, it can be seen clearly that Japan’s railway tunnel is much longer than the one placed in Mont-Blanc mountain. Also, the Seikan railway tunnel was constructed longer than the Mont-Blanc road tunnel.
It can be seen that there are no similarities between the depth of the two tunnels. The depth of the Mont-Blanc tunnel is 3.5 km at its maximum compared with 240m used to build the Seikan tunnel. Therefore, while the Mont-Blanc tunnel is deeper than the Seikan railway tunnel, the length of roadway connecting Italy and France is only 11,6 km; the Seikan is much longer, at 53,85 km.
Another noticeable feature is that the construction times used to build two tunnels were significantly different. It took 42 years to complete the construction of the Seikan railway tunnel in Japan, between 1946 and 1988; while it took only 8 years, between 1957 and 1965.
- Nowadays most people learn academic study in university but others think we should encourage to learn vocational skills more do you agree or disagree 73
- The position of women in society has changed markedly in the last twenty years Many of the problems young people now experience such as juvenile delinquency arise from the fact that many married women now work and are not at home to care for their childre 56
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, therefore, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02808988764 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74879895959 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.539325842697 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0817833383 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4444444444 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20512936362 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108464123391 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082175257007 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140634809713 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0836613310741 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.