The diagrams show the problem of flooding in a UK town and two possible solutions.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The three diagrams illustrate the flooding incident of an area in the UK and compare the two potential measures.
Overall, a severe flood is intruding into the town with an alarming effects on most of the corners. Moreover, there are two feasible solutions, namely relocation and dams.
As can be apparently seen from the first figure, almost half of the town is drowned. In the north, both Industrial Park and Residential Area are affected with a peak of fifty percent of infrastructure flooded. Similarly, the same devastation also occurred towards Commercial district, down to the southern region of the UK town.
Regarding the method in which facilities and places for living are moved much further up compared to the original locations, this has its own advantage as well as disadvantage. The benefit of this solution is that the environment of the rivers is preserved, while it is likely to be highly priced.
In contrast, the construction of dams at the estuaries of the rivers - River Awl and River Bole - seems less costly. However, the only drawback for this is of the need to spare more land for building up the reservoirs and dams.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-22 | tamnguyen520 | 89 | view |
- Telling the truth at all times is not essential. On some occasions it is necessary to tell lies, and it is wrong to tell the truth. 78
- As well as making money, businesses also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- The diagrams show the problem of flooding in a UK town and two possible solutions Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 69, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ntruding into the town with an alarming effects on most of the corners. Moreover, there...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...solutions, namely relocation and dams. As can be apparently seen from the first...
^^^
Line 6, column 283, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s is preserved, while it is likely to be highly priced. In contrast, the const...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, first, however, if, moreover, regarding, similarly, so, well, while, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 959.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9689119171 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80967615196 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652849740933 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.4869779326 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.23603664747 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.13902439024 439% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.108370795657 0.215688989381 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0429318790173 0.103423049105 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512673668592 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.066629631012 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624182489423 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.06136585366 118% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 40.7170731707 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.