The figures below compare the number of internet users in several European nations as well as the prevalence of online shopping in these countries.
A glance at the figures reveals that Internet use in Europe exponentially grew in the period from 1995 to 2004. In addition, the UK was ranked first in the popularity of online shopping among the five countries listed.
As can be seen from the table, Internet was always most widely used by British people in all three years. From 16 million in 1995, the figure steadily increased to 22 million in 2000 before surging to a staggering 41 million in 2004. More surprisingly, the quantity of Internet users in here was by far larger than that of the second most country - Germany, at 15 million in 2004. This country and France experienced a threefold climb in the number of Internet users over the 10 year-period, from 5 to 15 million and from 2 to 6 million, respectively. Likewise, the other two countries, Switzerland and Spain even had a fourfold growth of Internet users between 1995 and 2004.
Proportionally, the popularity of online shopping in the UK, therefore, stood at the highest position among European countries. However, it is a paradox that Spain, which was ranked last in the total number of Internet users, had the second most online buyers in Europe. Meanwhile, there were moderate levels of online shopping in France, Germany and Switzerland.
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995. 78
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 200.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The table below provides statistics on several major metro (MRT) systems around the world. 78
- The chart below shows the annual pay (thousands of US dollars) for doctors and other workers in seven countries in 2004. 61
- The graph below shows the rate of women s literacy and population growth in selected countries from 1988 to 2000 54
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, likewise, second, therefore, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92056074766 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79186022297 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579439252336 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 21.9317121995 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.3 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206753444019 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858315668143 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0381494610678 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148855984216 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044194903364 0.0819641961636 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.