The first chart below gives information about the money spent by
British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014.
The second chart shows the number of children who participated in
three sports in Britain over the same time period.
The provided line graph sketch out details on the average amount of money that parents spent on their children’s sport and the number of children taking part in three different kinds of sport over a period of 6 year from 2008 to 2014.
A glance at the graph reveals that parents tended to spend more on their children’s sport each year over the six-year period. While in terms of participants in sports, the number for football outweighed that of athletics and swimming.
In 2008, the figure showed that parents spent roughly about 20 pounds for their children. Parents’ expenditure on sports gradually increased over six years and finally stood at more than 30 pounds in 2014.
Looking at participation numbers, it is conspicuous that football was the most popular choice among children with 7.5 million participants, while only 2 million children engaged in swimming and less than 1 million enrolled in athletics. Over six years, figures for football remained relatively stable with nearly 10 million in 2014. On the contrary, the number of children participating in athletics shot up to nearly 5 million, and there was an upward trend in that of swimming, which stood at 4.5 million in the same year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-18 | abducool5 | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-01 | Evelyn_Han | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-24 | febthepotter | 84 | view |
| 2018-08-17 | Dung nguyen | 78 | view |
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent byBritish parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014.The second chart shows the number of children who participated inthree sports in Britain over the same time period. 84
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visitedfour types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999. 84
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon, from egg toadult fish. 61
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon, from egg toadult fish. 78
- The diagrams below show the design for a wave-energy machine and its location. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, look, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1022.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05940594059 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8037464258 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584158415842 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 280.8 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.879184514 43.030603864 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.75 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31605734957 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149277363901 0.103423049105 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0978820462805 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225797150534 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867369298738 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.