The first chart below gives information about the money spent by
British parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014.
The second chart shows the number of children who participated in
three sports in Britain over the same time period.
The line graphs show the average monthly amount that parents in Britain
spent on their children’s sporting activities and the number of British
children who took part in three different sports from 2008 to 2014.
It is clear that parents spent more money each year on their children’s
participation in sports over the six-year period. In terms of the number of
children taking part, football was significantly more popular than athletics
and swimming.
In 2008, British parents spent an average of around £20 per month on
their children’s sporting activities. Parents’ spending on children’s sports
increased gradually over the following six years, and by 2014 the average
monthly amount had risen to just over £30.
Looking at participation numbers, in 2008 approximately 8 million British
children played football, while only 2 million children were enrolled in
swimming clubs and less than 1 million practised athletics. The figures for football participation remained relatively stable over the following 6
years. By contrast, participation in swimming almost doubled, to nearly 4
million children, and there was a near fivefold increase in the number of
children doing athletics.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-18 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | Mei1312 | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-31 | my220904 | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-15 | khangoccho | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-13 | felixchen | view |
- Universities accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 78
- The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1042.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66304347826 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94328478588 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603260869565 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5630047694 43.030603864 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.25 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.875 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 16.0 3.83414634146 417% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41638731954 0.215688989381 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.19089425848 0.103423049105 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116685100205 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144666782456 0.15604864568 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104436125004 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.4140731707 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.